Kenya Court Refuses to Suspend Ruling That Nullified Safaricom Stake Sale
A Kenyan court has rejected a bid to suspend an earlier ruling that nullified a Safaricom stake sale, leaving the nullification in force. The decision resets Kenya's most significant pending telecom ownership dispute.
Safaricom: the deal that got the law right but the order wrong
The government and Vodacom won almost every legal argument. The court accepted the correct legislation, accepted the share price wasn't its business, accepted that normal procurement rules didn't apply.
They lost on sequence. The price was locked in before the valuation was done. Agreements were signed with Vodafone Kenya — a subsidiary — while Parliament and the public were approving a sale to Vodacom Group, the parent. Those are legally distinct companies, and no one ever went back to get approval for the actual buyer.
That's not a technicality. That's the entire transaction.
For anyone structuring a major deal in Kenya — or anywhere on the continent where public assets and parliamentary approval intersect — the lesson is uncomfortable: getting the law right isn't enough if you execute it in the wrong order.
1 source
- Kenya Court Rejects Bid to Suspend Ruling Nullifying Safaricom Stake Sale · innovation-village.com · T2